Date Received: Feb 04, 2021
Date Published: Dec 31, 2021
Views
Download
Section:
How to Cite:
The Supported Policies in the Afforestation and Perennial Crops Project and its Effects on the Local Peoples’ Livelihoods in Dien Bien Province of Vietnam
,
Do Thi Thanh Duong
2
,
Ngo Thanh Son
1
Keywords
Policy, subsidy, afforestation, livelihood, Northwest Vietnam
Abstract
The Afforestation and Perennial Tree Plantation Project were implemented in several mountainous areas in Dien Bien province, Vietnam, for many purposes such as providing agricultural products, increasing incomes for the people in the projected areas, and reducing shifting cultivation. Based on these reasons, the central and local governments implemented several policies and subsidies for the growers, including rice subsidies for ethnic minorities who planted forests to replace shifting cultivation; investment support for planting protective forests and special-use forests; and providing seedlings. This article aimed to provide a clear view of the supporting policies in the Afforestation and Perennial Crops Project and its effects on the local people’s livelihoods in Dien Bien province of Vietnam. By analyzing the types of the capital of the livelihood assets (human capital, natural capital, financial capital, physical capital, and social capital), indicators of each capital type were chosen and scored in the context of achieving sustainable livelihoods. The results identified that the government has issued several policies to help the investors and farmers involved in this project. However, there were some concerns about the policies in practice, for example, the low percentage of dividend sharing for farmers, unclear land use rights, and inadequate applications of the policies in reality. In evaluating the livelihood assets, significant differences were found in the sustainable livelihood index gained between the rubber-based and non-rubber-based groups.
References
Baker T. L. (1999). Doing Social Research (3rd ed). The McGraw-Hill Book Co. McGraw-Hill College.
Brown P. R., Grunbuhel C. M., Williams L., Roth C., Pitkin C. Reddy V. R., Chiranjeevi T., Khan I., Afroz S., Sacklokham S., Chialue L. & Sotheary E. (2012). Understanding the capacity of small-scale farmer in Asia to adapt to climate change. CSIRO, Ecosystem Sciences and CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship.
Carney D. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: What contribution can we make. Department of International Development, London, UK.
Castella J. C., Boissau S., Thanh N. H. & Novosad P. (2006). Impact of forestland allocation on land use in a mountainous province of Vietnam. Land Use Policy. 23: 147-160.
Clement F. C. (2008). A multi-level analysis of forest policies in Northern Vietnam: Uplands, people, institutions and discourses (Doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne).
Chen H. Y., Shivakoti G. P., Zhu T., Krott. M., Calvo F. & Makoto I. (2013). Measurement and evaluation of livelihood assets in sustainable forest commons governance. Land Use Policy. 30: 908-914.
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development in Dien Bien (2019). Report on Socio-economic Development. Dien Bien province: 35-68.
Douangsavanh L., Thammavong B. & Noble A. (2008). Meeting regional and global demands for rubber: A key to poverty alleviation in Lao PDR? Bangkok, Thailand: The Sustainable Mekong Research Network (Sumernet).
Jamieson N. L., Cuc T. C. & Rambo A. T. (1998): The Development Crisis in Vietnam’s Mountains. Honolulu, East-West Center Special Reports: 6.
Kazuhiro G. (2011). The Front of War for Sustainable Forest Management, Dien Bien Province. Project for Sustainable Forest Management in the Northwest Watershed Area. JICA – Dien Bien Province.Muangkaew, T., Shivakoti, G.P, (2005). Effect of livelihood assets on rice productivity: case study of rice-based farming in southern Thailand. Journal of International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences (ISSAAS). 11(2): 63-83.
Li Z. & Fox J. M. (2012). Mapping rubber tree growth in mainland Southeast Asia using time-series MODIS 250 m NDVI and statistical data. Applied Geography. 32(2): 420-432.
Muangkaew T. & Shivakoti P. G. (2005). Effect of livelihood assets on rice productivity: A case study of rice based farming in southern Thailand. Journal of International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Science. 11: 63-83.
Pensuk A. & Shrestha R. P. (2008). Effect of land use change on rural livelihoods: A case study of Patthalung Water shed, Southern Thailand. Asia-Pacific journal of rural development. 18(2). DOI: 10.1177/1018529120080209.
Quang N. N., Wildemeersch D. & Masschelein J. (2015). The five million hectare reforestation programme in Vietnam–lessons and policy implications. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development. 14(1): 40-55.
Scoones I. (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS working paper 72, IDS: Brighton.
Simelton E. S., Catacutan D. C., Dao T. C., Dam B. V., & Le T. D. (2017). Factors constraining and enabling agroforestry adoption in Viet Nam: a multi-level policy analysis. Agroforestry Systems. 91(1): 51-67.
TNEPRP (2004). Livelihood Assessment Report. Tamil Nadu Empowerment and Poverty Reduction Project (TNEPRP). Institute of Development Alternatives.
Trædal L. T. & Angelsen A. (2020). Policies Drive Sub-National Forest Transitions in Vietnam. Forests, 11(10): 1038.
WB (2007). Tools for Institutional, Political, and Social Analysis of Policy Reform. The international Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank.
WRM (2010). Monocultures on the march in Southeast Asia. World Rainforest Movement’s bulletin No. 158.
Ziegler, A. D., Fox, J. M., & Xu, J. (2009). The rubber juggernaut. Science. 324(5930): 1024-1025.